EnigmA Amiga Run 1995 November/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 02 (1995)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1995-11][Skylink CD].iso/earcd/docs/lwml9506.lha/LIGHTWAVE-JUNE95/[e-mail]_Mon Jun 19 20:33:51 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-07-04 | 2KB

Received: by webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA209379231; Mon, 19 Jun 1995 20:33:51 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from access4.digex.net by webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA209299226; Mon, 19 Jun 1995 20:33:46 -0700
Received: (from erniew@localhost) by access4.digex.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id XAA11649 ; for ; Mon, 19 Jun 1995 23:37:43 -0400
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 23:37:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ernie Wright <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Rendering Backwards
In-Reply-To: <[e-mail]>
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

John Crookshank wrote:

> Well, if you were to "flip fields", you would render:
> (2 1) (4 3) (6 5)
> Then if you were to record this backwards, you would get:
> (6 5) (4 3) (2 1)
>
> Isn't this exactly what you would want for a backwards animation?

Yes.  What I was talking about, though, was rendering the first half of
a palindrome animation and then using those same frames, in reverse, for
the second half.  There doesn't appear to be a simple way to do this if
the frames are field rendered.

- Ernie

--
Ernie Wright <[e-mail]> sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]